Template talk:Triple image

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Codename Lisa in topic Mark template as deprecated

2008 edit

Recently some changes at double and triple image have given the text an automatic wrap around. Are there any other new features? Is there a way to make the images all the same height with a simple command or parameter?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 06:29, 30 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Mark template as deprecated edit

This template has much better equivalent - {{Multiple image}} and has only 188 transluctions. I think we should mark this with {{Tdeprecated}} for now. --Rezonansowy (talkcontribs) 19:25, 3 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit protected}} template. As things stand, it's a wrapper for {{multiple image}}, and has been since this edit. Judging by the TfD, there was considerable opposition to outright deletion, which is what {{tdeprecated}} would be a step towards. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:44, 3 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
That's a pure-admin action and doesn't need the community consensus. Besides, it's a deprecated redirect to thr template, which no longer exist. That's a temporary substitution to avoid mess on Wikipedia and that's why this information is necessary. --Rezonansowy (talkcontribs) 14:37, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
  Not done: Sorry, but we can't go against TfD results. If you want to challenge the result you'll have to ask the closing admin. Also, this template is only semi-protected, not fully protected. And it's not a redirect, it's a wrapper template, and the parent template (Template:Multiple image) still exists. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 01:24, 7 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Done Codename Lisa made the edit. --Rezonansowy (talkcontribs) 14:05, 11 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Yes, I did it after a chat with User:Plastikspork, the closing admin, who is, by the way, the editor who committed the provided diff above. It was the best thing to do at the time. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 14:42, 11 January 2014 (UTC)Reply