Template talk:MultiLicenceWithCC-By-All-IntEng
 | Template:MultiLicenceWithCC-By-All-IntEng is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit protected}} to notify an administrator to make the requested edit. This template does not have a documentation subpage. You can create the documentation subpage here. If the template page contains categories or usage notes, move these to the documentation subpage. If the template does not require documentation, add |doc=no to this template ({{permanently protected}}).
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
Replace Image:Somerightsreserved.png with Image:CC Some rights reserved.png and nowiki "high-risk" onto the page. -- Chris is me (u/c/t) 06:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Protection template added -- but both of those images seem to have been deleted. It appears that that what's on there, now, Image:Somerights.png, was moved to commons, so possibly it was deleted there. =\ Taking down the protected edit request, for now; feel free to put it back, once you have another image in mind. Luna Santin 19:50, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
{{editprotected}}
Image:CC-logo.svg should be removed as non-free images are not allowed in templates. Kotepho 07:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- This page is a little more complicated than most, I believe. It seems to be incredibly stable, and I'm unsure if the standard rules apply here. My suggestion is to ask User:Ed g2s or User:Cyde. One of them will probably know the answer. Cheers. --MZMcBride 20:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- The standard rules do apply and they are expressly clear on this. Non-free images must not be used outside of the main namespace, in templates, and certainly not to decorate someone's userpage. Note that very few of the license templates use the offical logo(only this one it seems) or Image:Somerights20.png (which should be replaced with Image:CC_some_rights_reserved.svg from commons also, as it is non-free while the svg is actually free) (Template:Cc-by-sa-2.0, others in Category:Image copyright tags). I would suggest that in the future in cases where you are the one that is not familar with policy that you might be the one that needs to seek clarification or ignore a request so that someone actually familar with things may respond to it. Nevertheless, I will do as you request. Kotepho 15:15, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Wikimedia licensing update edit
{{editprotected}} Please replace the text under the [http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html GFDL] in this template with under [[WP:Copyrights|Wikipedia's copyright terms]], per meta:Licensing update/Result. Thanks. Anomie⚔ 20:31, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 26 July 2021 edit
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I request that this template be moved to Category:Wikipedia copyright templates. It doesn't belong in Category:Copyright user templates it should only be for userboxes. Catfurball (talk) 17:53, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Not done} see centralized discussion on this at Template_talk:TextLicenseFreeUse#Protected_edit_request_on_26_July_2021. — xaosflux Talk 18:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
