Template talk:Mobile Grain

Kenaston

Kenaston shows twice in the diagrams. One of them must be wrong… Tuvalkin (talk) 10:46, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Fxed thx! CapnZapp (talk) 14:50, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Suggested alternate diagram topology

Mobile Grain
Big Sky Rail Last Mountain Railway CN trackage Regina Condie Lumsden Disley Bethune Findlater Chamberlain Aylesbury Craik Girvin Davidson Bladworth Kenaston Hanley Dundurn Saskatoon Blairmore Vanscoy Delisle CP Outlook Sub Macrorie Tichfield Jct Dunblane Birsay Lucky Lake Beechy Dinsmore Wiseton Elrose Wartime Jct Kyle Plato Richley CN White Bear Sub Eston Madison Glidden Eatonia Laporte CN Mantario Sub

Advantages: less wide (only 2 icon columns) and station label staggering is minimized. Opinions? Tuvalkin (talk) 10:46, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Ok by me CapnZapp (talk) 14:54, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Saskatoon

Depending on the local topology, Saskatoon can be represented as   instead of . Tuvalkin (talk) 11:47, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

I prefer the alternative Saskatoon representation; by the map its more of a thru line (except it only skirts southern edge of the city). CapnZapp (talk) 14:54, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

I see what you mean — but both lines do fork here, still a long way from the station. Tuvalkin (talk) 21:24, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Not sure we're talking on the same page here. Since I don't know your google maps voodoo :-) let me show you how I'm envisioning it. Caution: mad paint skillz! http://i257.photobucket.com/albums/hh205/kazapp/saskatoo.png Note the similarity to   if rotated 90 degrees clockwise. But I might have mistraced the rail lines in question... CapnZapp (talk) 11:03, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

I get it. Makes perfect sense, then, as this is not a detailed diagram showing every detail of the network. Tuvalkin (talk) 20:36, 8 November 2013 (UTC)