Template:Did you know nominations/Truth and Justice (Afghanistan)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 06:46, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Truth and Justice (Afghanistan) edit
- ... that the multi-ethnic Truth and Justice party of Afghanistan supports reconciliation with the Taliban and cooperation with ISAF?
- Reviewed: Religious language.
- Comment: There are also 2 pics on the page that we can use if need be.,
Created/expanded by Lihaas (talk). Self nom at 13:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not an administrator or anything experiences. However, I analyzed some sources, and I'm not sure if they are reliable. #1 is a blog; #2 is a bare URL; #3 is verifiable and looks reliable because it is a news article; #4 that cites a hook doesn't mention ISAF; #5... is it or is it not user-submitted? The article needs an Arabic language. ISAF is less simple; International Security Assistance Force is more simple, even when long. --George Ho (talk) 02:49, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- you dont have to be an admin to review ;) Did you have 5 DYK noms before?
- As for sources:
youre right on 1, ill get another;not sure how 2 happened i ran reflinks, also redid; 4 with the ISAF reference has now been changed as there were 2 rferl sources (for the record the bit about ISAF is not in the soruce but it says about the intl forces which per WP:Common sense is led by ISAF);for 5 doesnt look like its user submitted/wiki. I read this, which inidiates its from a NGO itself. - Also not sure which language to put n: Pashtun, Uzbek, Tajik, Haza (?)Lihaas (talk) 05:07, 5 March 2012 (UTC) q
- Mmmm.... Diversive languages. You may include these languages, especially if they are relevant to the topic and help ease search. In other words, include all; no need to choose one. --George Ho (talk) 07:39, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
