Template:Did you know nominations/The Elstree Project

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  Ohc ¡digame! 16:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

The Elstree Project

edit

Sir Roger Moore being interviewed for The Elstree Project, September 2012

Created by HowardBerry (talk), Michaelzeng7 (talk). Nominated by HowardBerry (talk) at 18:17, 2 February 2014 (UTC).

  • Appropriate link, interesting. --HectorMoffet (talk) 21:04, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, sorry but I'm confused as to the use of this icon and the comment. I've looked at WP:DYKR and it says it "may be used by creators and nominators to indicate that a nomination that previously had a problem is ready to be reviewed again after changes were made to resolve the issues identified". I'm the creator and nominator, and also no previous problem was identified... hence my confusion! Do I need to do something to help here, or is this an error? Howie 22:06, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Howie, all that turn-around symbol means here is that HectorMoffet didn't give us details of what he checked. Per DYK review instructions the reviewer should indicate all aspects of the article that were checked. Details that are supposed to be checked in a review can be found at DYKReviewing guide. So either HectorMoffet needs to detail that, or someone else needs to do the review. That's what that turn-around symbol means here. — Maile (talk) 21:18, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Ah! Thanks for clarifying! Howie 23:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
I just put a note on HectorMoffet's talk page. Maybe he wasn't aware of this conversation that has happened since he did the review.— Maile (talk) 23:21, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you! Howie 00:02, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

The following has been checked in this review by Maile

  • No QPQ necessary as author has no previous DYKs
  • Article moved from Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Elstree Project on February 2, 2014 and has 2,253 characters of readale prose
  • Every paragraph sourced, both online and offline
  • No bare URLs, and no external links used as inline sources
  • Hook is 170 characters, stated in the article and appropriately sourced
  • Image is the author's own work
  • Duplication Detector check of online sourcing found no copyvio
  • Disambig links tool found no issues
  • External links tool found no issues
This is good 2 go. Keep up the good work. — Maile (talk) 16:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)