Template:Did you know nominations/The Age of Innocence (book)

The following is an archived discussion of The Age of Innocence (book)'s DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Carabinieri (talk) 22:06, 25 February 2013 (UTC).

The Age of Innocence (Hamilton book)

(

)

... that in 2010 a man from England was convicted on child pornography charges for purchasing books including The Age of Innocence from a mainstream bookshop?

Created by Freikorp (talk). Self nominated at 23:20, 17 February 2013 (UTC).

Must not use non-free image; also, renamed the title of article. Nevertheless, per rules, do not rename the nomination title. --George Ho (talk) 23:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

I don't want to formally review this because I don't want to prevent it from reaching the front page, but I want to note what I see as a major oversight. It's an excellent article about the legal aspects of the book, but there's absolutely nothing in the article about the artistic aspects of the book - opinions of art critics, book reviewers, etc. Gamaliel (talk) 22:31, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Acknowledged. I've now managed to put together a reception section. Freikorp (talk) 13:51, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Excellent. So there's no reason for this article not to be on the front page, once inline citations are added to the hook sentence, not just to the end of that paragraph. Gamaliel (talk) 23:49, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Awesome. I've added citation to the hook sentence accordingly. Freikorp (talk) 04:01, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Ready to go. Gamaliel (talk) 17:57, 25 February 2013 (UTC)