Template:Did you know nominations/Sung Min Song

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 01:59, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Sung Min Song

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 08:47, 18 October 2022 (UTC).

  • I will review this nomination shortly. Adog (TalkCont) 01:56, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

General eligibility:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: The article was created on 04:23, 10 October 2022, shy of seven days for newness, which would have been on 11 October when nominated on 18 October. Though, I do think the article is excellent. It has a proper length of 3520 characters, adequate sourcing, is neutral in tone, and is free from plagiarism and copyright as Earwig detected, at most, 4.8%. Although Earwig did pick up from two sources a match for the phrase who made an international career based in Germany, I would reword this in the future. The hook is interesting and cited within the article through various lines. It is interesting to see such a vast career jump, no less between international communities and different work mediums. I am unfamiliar with the art of opera, which led me to listen and watch some performances by Sung Min Song, which were delightfully calming for this Sunday night.

As for additional comments: I do question if he was a informatics engineer or a computer engineer as per its source. I cannot read German, so Google Translate is my buddy here, roughly translating "engineer for computer technology" (Saarbrücker Zeitung). I am unsure if DYK skirts the newness rule for articles that just miss this time frame by a day, so let me know if this was an error, and I'd be happy to change it (or if my UTC-math is wrong). If not, I do think this article has a deserving chance with improvement in five-fold expansion or Good Article status. Adog (TalkCont) 03:37, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

I am sorry that I failed to see my math error in the days. I did see it for two other nominations, where it was pardoned. English is not my native language, - he is not a scientist, and computer engineer would tell me he engineered computers, which he didn't. But I see that the informatics rngineering article is so poor that we better don't link to it. - I fixed the "made a career" sentence. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:48, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
No fault on you, and understood for the engineer's comment. I will request a new reviewer, as I would like to see this passed. I am unsure if I can personally make the call to skirt around the newness timeframe (the DYK criteria does not have a rule about nominations that are barely over the timeframe, relatively speaking). I would be happy if a more experienced DYK reviewer would endorse it to confirm if we can subside the rule. I do hope for the best! Adog (TalkCont) 11:14, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
@Adog: It's pretty standard practice to let nominators get away with being a day or two late ;) theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/her) 19:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
@Gerda Arendt and Theleekycauldron: Will pass this accordingly! Apologies for the delay, and I will note this practice moving forward for my reviews. To the front page! Adog (TalkCont) 01:09, 2 November 2022 (UTC)