Template:Did you know nominations/St. Martinus, Hattersheim
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Z1720 (talk) 18:10, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
St. Martinus, Hattersheim
St. Martinus, Hattersheim
... that when the new church St. Martinus in Hattersheim was built in 1915 with allusions to Jugendstil, the architect incorporated elements from the earlier church (pictured)?Source: [1], [2]- Reviewed: Gian Franco Bottazzo
- Comment: The chapel in the foreground was the choir of the older church, do you see?
Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 17:44, 4 August 2022 (UTC).
Article meets DYK requirement and no close paraphrasing was found. QPQ is done, and the image is suitable. German-language sources accepted in good faith. The "allusions" sentence in the article lacks a footnote, so that needs to be fixed. Finally, the article needs some minor copyediting as I can see some grammar and spelling errors. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:35, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review! I duplicated the ref (sorry that I missed) and added another one, which says "elements", therefore:
- ALT0a: ... that when the new church St. Martinus in Hattersheim was built in 1915 with elements of Jugendstil, the architect incorporated parts from the earlier church (pictured)?
- I found some grammar mistakes, please check again. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:54, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Thank you. ALT0a is fine too so the nom is good to go. My only concern is that "pictured" should probably come after St. Martinus rather than "earlier church" given that it seems to depict the whole church rather than just the original church. However, that's something that can be easily fixed in prep should the promoter choose it as the image hook. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:36, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. I placed pictured where it is because the incorporation can be seen on the image, - better ways to say so in the pictured clause or the caption welcome. Every reader with a basic knowledge about architecture will see that the image shows a 1915 building, not "earlier". To be double clear, we could add "1747" or "Baroque" to the "earlier" but I tried to be short. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:45, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
