Template:Did you know nominations/She Must Be Seeing Things

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:37, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

She Must Be Seeing Things

edit
  • ... that according to the Lesbian Film Guide, She Must Be Seeing Things was a "deeply controversial film ... dismissed outright by some as pornography"?

Created by Edwardx (talk), Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 21:13, 1 August 2014 (UTC).

  • < 7 days old; 2600+ character article; 178- and 142-character hooks; both hooks cited and verified in sources; within policy. The main hook is more "hooky" than the ALT. The controversy itself may be a little complex to summarize within DYK's word limit. Then again, people can click through and find out what the deep pornographic controversy was. Rupert Clayton (talk) 07:57, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
  • I suggest deleting "on release" from the approved hook. Yoninah (talk) 22:57, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks. I'm all for shorter hooks, so I've trimmed "on release". We already have "was", and thus "on release" is largely redundant. Edwardx (talk) 08:46, 6 August 2014 (UTC)