Template:Did you know nominations/Sam Panopoulos

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:28, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Sam Panopoulos edit

Hawaiian pizza, Panopoulos's invention
Hawaiian pizza, Panopoulos's invention

Created by Edwardx (talk), WWGB (talk), and 86WikiEditor (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 22:54, 17 June 2017 (UTC).

  • Article is new enough. Problem is that the prose, albeit neutral, clocks at 1238 characters; this is well below the 1500 characters needed. Also, if you want this to be featured in the main page, there must not be a single bare URL in the article: ref 8 is not using an inline citation. (I don't suppose ref 1 could be considered reliable, either.) Bluesphere 15:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Thank you, Bluesphere. DYK check wasn't working for me, so I was unaware that the article was too short. It is now long enough, with no bare URLs, and a better sources than ref 8 have been found. Edwardx (talk) 13:13, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
  • This needs a new reviewer, then. Bluesphere 14:02, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Bluesphere, perhaps I'm missing something - why can't you just finish the review? Edwardx (talk) 14:18, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Because I already gave a full review and I can't approve a hook that I previously failed. Bluesphere 14:19, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Doesn't look like a full review to me Bluesphere, and I can't identify any policy basis for you not to finish the job. Edwardx (talk) 14:27, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Alright, I stand corrected. I'll give it a second review. Article is new, as I've said before. Prose is neutrally written and has been expanded to 1638 characters, so it's now long enough. References are reliable and supported inline. Image used is properly licensed and used in the article. Hook is concise and interesting. However, you need a QPQ for this entry. No need to ping me in case you're done as I've put this one into my watchlist. Bluesphere 14:43, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Thank you. QPQ now done. Edwardx (talk) 19:30, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
  • OK, good to go. Bluesphere 01:30, 20 June 2017 (UTC)