Template:Did you know nominations/Roz Young

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  — Amakuru (talk) 13:17, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Roz Young edit

  • ... that Roz Young's column appeared opposite the Editorial page in the Dayton Daily News at a time when most women writers were relegated to the women's pages? ”She began her career in journalism at a time when women writers were confined to the women’s pages” Dayton Daily News August 19 2005 Editorial page [1]
    • ALT1:... that columnist Roz Young often assessed 25-cent fines to Dayton Daily News colleagues who allowed grammatical errors to make it into print? ”She instituted a system of 25-cent fines for every grammaticalerro” Source: Bill Wild for the Dayton Daily News Aug 21 2005 [2]
    • ALT2:... that Roz Young often mentioned her cat, Edith, in her popular Dayton Daily News column? ”Followers of Young’s Sunday editorial page columns have seen the devoted couple through a season of life changes.” Laura Dempsey for the Dayton Daily News Dec 6 1996 [3]

Created by Valereee (talk). Self-nominated at 19:02, 13 November 2018 (UTC).

  • Non-free files like File:Roz young 1991.jpeg can only be used in the article namespace per WP:NFCC#9; they cannot be used in templates, etc. like this, so the file has been removed from this page. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:04, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Oh, sorry, I didn't know! Thanks for removing! valereee (talk) 09:29, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Ugh, and I just realized I probably have put this in the wrong place...the article was created on the 11th, not yesterday. Should I move it? valereee (talk) 10:45, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Okay, moved it valereee (talk) 11:06, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- Length, Date, Cite (AGF for paywall refs on most hook claims, some parts verified by accessible online refs), Earwigs, and QPQ check. All three hooks approved at promoter's discretion though I personally favor ALT1. Best, Mifter (talk) 22:47, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

@Mifter: @Marchjuly: @Nick Moyes: @Valereee: unfortunately I've had to pull this one from the queue, as there are two sections in the article that have orange tags for being under-referenced. Please could you have a look at the issues and then reapprove? Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 11:18, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Amakuru done @Mifter: @Marchjuly: @Nick Moyes: Can someone please check and reapprove? valereee (talk) 12:10, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

@Valereee: OK, great that looks good now. I'm re-promoting this on the basis of the original AGF checks done above, and putting it into Prep 2 as a direct swap with the hook I slotted in to replace this one earlier today. I think it will go live on Sunday probably. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 13:17, 14 December 2018 (UTC)