- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 13:51, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Rohese Giffard
edit
Created by Ealdgyth (talk). Self-nominated at 15:02, 19 January 2016 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
- Cited:
 - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
- Interesting:
|
Overall: 
This is fine in every respect. The article is well written and rigorously cited. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:05, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I don't see what " (d. after 1113)" adds to either hook? Edwardx (talk) 22:58, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- It grounds the thing in time (I no longer assume that any random person has any clue what Domesday Book is...) Ealdgyth - Talk 23:33, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
-
- Thank you. In my opinion, that would be a better solution! Edwardx (talk) 13:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
This is fine in every respect. The article is well written and rigorously cited. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:05, 19 January 2016 (UTC)