- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 00:03, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Prosecution of S Iswaran
Created by Kingoflettuce (talk). Self-nominated at 00:33, 19 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Criminal investigation of S Iswaran; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- I know this is a nomination about a case so a similar wording might be inevitable, but the current wording does give me pause and I wonder if it might violate BLP. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:26, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see a BLP issue with the hook. However, I changed the hook from "minister" to "cabinet minister" per the source, so I would like a response to the change from Kingoflettuce before taking this nom further. Gatoclass (talk) 13:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Gatoclass There's no real distinction as far as the Singapore government is concerned. All "ministers" are members of the Cabinet so "cabinet ministers" sounds redundant IMO, but no harm done. Cheers, KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 13:26, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall:
Gatoclass (
talk) 12:16, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Gatoclass (talk) 12:16, 25 January 2024 (UTC)