Template:Did you know nominations/Paul Thurmond

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 20:37, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Paul Thurmond

edit

Created/expanded by Muboshgu (talk). Self nom at 21:39, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

  • I added one of your QPQs for you, Muboshgu. --George Ho (talk) 23:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
  • New enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline except for ALT1, which I have struck out. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:23, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
  • Thank you. I moved the source saying Strom was 73 to the end of that sentence, so that one can be un-struck in case it's the one a promoter likes the best. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:52, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
  • I've unstruck ALT1 because issues are already resolved. All hooks now well-verified, so promoter may choose any hooks. I would prefer ALT1 or ALT2; original hook is not appealing at worldwide standards. I added his family life, but I'm sure that it would not affect this review. --George Ho (talk) 22:12, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
  • I agree with George. I didn't mean to put one in the first slot meaning I favored it; I simply wrote them in the order they came to my mind. ALT1 and ALT2 are better than the Vanderbilt hook. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:36, 21 December 2012 (UTC)