Template:Did you know nominations/Morpeth, Northumberland

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:58, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Morpeth, Northumberland

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the town of Morpeth, Northumberland held its own professional Olympic games from 1873 to 1958, barring interruptions from the two world wars? Source: When Morpeth had its very own Olympics and Sport event to recall Morpeth Olympic Games
  • ALT1:... that professional Olympic games were held in Morpeth, Northumberland from 1873 to 1958? Source: When Morpeth had its very own Olympics and Sport event to recall Morpeth Olympic Games
  • ALT2:... that professional Olympic games were held in Morpeth, Northumberland from 1873 to 1958, barring interruptions from the two world wars? Source: When Morpeth had its very own Olympics and Sport event to recall Morpeth Olympic Games
  • ALT4:... that the town of Morpeth, Northumberland held its own professional Olympic games from 1873 to 1958? Source: When Morpeth had its very own Olympics and Sport event to recall Morpeth Olympic Games

Improved to Good Article status by Dreamy Jazz (talk) and SkyGazer 512 (talk). Nominated by Dreamy Jazz (talk) at 12:20, 12 March 2019 (UTC).

• Full review will follow later, but I think ALT4 has the best wording, so let's go with that. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

• Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:14, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Unfortunately, as I've been rather busy with many things as of late, I don't think I have enough time to fully review this anymore. With that said, from my end it looks okay for the most part and I can confirm that the hook fact meets requirements. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:50, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

• Full review still needed. Thank you to whoever takes this on in full. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:28, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

 Doing... starting review for nomination. Flibirigit (talk) 16:09, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

the Earwig tool is not working for me right now. I will post a partial review shortly, and come back later today and try Earwig again. Flibirigit (talk) 16:23, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Article passed GA review on March 11, and nominated the next day. Length and sourcing are adequate. Article is neutral in tone. No plagiarism issues detected once the Earwig tool worked for me. Hooks are properly cited and mentioned inline. No photo is used in this nomination, however photos in the article are properly licensed. Nominator has no DYK credits at this time, therefore QPQ is not required. Flibirigit (talk) 16:54, 30 April 2019 (UTC)