Template:Did you know nominations/Maureen Chiquet

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Nyttend (talk) 02:55, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Maureen Chiquet

edit
  • Comment: Not a self nomination

Created by Aardvark112 (talk). Nominated by Matty.007 (talk) at 14:36, 22 December 2013 (UTC).

  • You need to clarify who called her a Francophile. The article should have as well more meaningful categories, besides just "X year births" and "Living people" Cambalachero (talk) 20:40, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Attempted fix of both. Thanks, Matty.007 08:47, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Good to go Cambalachero (talk) 01:54, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi Cambalachero. Could you please give some details of what you checked on this? Per DYK review instructions please begin with one of the 5 review symbols that appear at the top of the edit screen, and then indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed. Thank you for doing this. — Maile (talk) 21:43, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Article New – within the past five days, the article has

  • been created (sandbox → mainspace is eligible) Green tickY
  • Long enough – the prose portion is at least 1,500 characters Green tickY

Within policy – meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular:

  • is neutral Green tickY
  • cites sources with inline citations Green tickY
  • is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism Green tickY

Hook

  • Format – fewer than 200 characters Green tickY (shorter is better) and meets the formatting guidelines

Content

  • interesting Green tickY
  • hook fact is accurate and cited with an inline citation in the article Green tickY
  • neutral and does not focus unduly on negative aspects of living people Green tickY

There it is Cambalachero (talk) 17:16, 11 January 2014 (UTC)