- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 03:09, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General
- ... that during November 2022 the Supreme Court of New Zealand ruled that the voting age of 18 was unjustified age discrimination in Make It 16 Inc v Attorney-General? Source: "A declaration is made that the provisions of the Electoral Act 1993 and of the Local Electoral Act 2001 which provide for a minimum voting age of 18 years are inconsistent with the right in s 19 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 to be free from discrimination on the basis of age; these inconsistencies have not been justified in terms of s 5 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act." http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZSC/2022/134.html
- Reviewed:
- Comment: Noting that this is my first WP:DYK nomination, I'll look into reviewing others, but I am relatively new to this process :) Thanks!
Improved to Good Article status by Carolina2k22 (talk). Self-nominated at 02:26, 3 January 2023 (UTC).
- Just noting that you don't have to review another nomination. You can, of course, give it a go if you wish, but it's not a requirement for the first five nominations. Schwede66 02:29, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall:
Looks fine to me.
BennyOnTheLoose (
talk) 16:55, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Looks fine to me. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 16:55, 3 January 2023 (UTC)