Template:Did you know nominations/Lectionary 311

Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Lectionary 311's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Carabinieri (talk) 03:34, 28 February 2013 (UTC).

Lectionary 311 edit

Created by Leszek Jańczuk (talk). Self nominated at 22:27, 20 February 2013 (UTC).

  • New enough, (just) long enough, adequate referencing. Found no copyvios with Copyvio Detector nor (to the limited extent online sources were used) with Duplication Detector. I also manually checked an online copy of the book in reference 2 albeit an older edition and did not find an issue. AGF on non-English ref for hook. Normally this style of hook (X is Y) is not prefered, but I think it is interesting enough as is (although someone may want to provide an alternate view). Rlendog (talk) 17:22, 26 February 2013 (UTC)