Template:Did you know nominations/Laia Manzanares

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:55, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Laia Manzanares

  • Reviewed: Marian Ciepielowski
  • Comment: There seems to be an error with the preview button but I don't know if that's only happening with this page

Created by Trillfendi (talk). Self-nominated at 23:28, 6 April 2020 (UTC).

General eligibility:

  • New enough: Yes
  • Long enough: No - the page has 1086 characters (it needs 1,500 characters altogether).
  • Other problems: Yes

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Trillfendi: Better source needed for the hook. It doesn't mention her name. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 13:41, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

  • @CAPTAIN MEDUSA: The catch-22 is English sources only describing the video and leaving out the actors whose names appeared in the credits, naturally because they wouldn't be known to the English speaking audience, or on the flip side me not putting Spanish sources there because I don't know if there are Spanish-speaking reviewers (or the much rarer Catalan) for DYK. FWIW, the second source I gave, Insider, said Laia Manzanares starred in the video. under the screenshot. A Spanish source is here. Pitchfork, given on the video article, has a screenshotted picture of her but no name or caption.
I think there is a bug on the statistics page that didn't update the characters after the second edit. The tool I just used said it's 1,135; I assumed it was about 1,600 when I did this page so I will add some more information. I'll do QPQ later today, in the meantime. ⌚️ (talk) 17:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Consider using DYKcheck, far better tool and a time saver. The article still needs the expansion. Thanks. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 03:13, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
@CAPTAIN MEDUSA: With new information added, the prose portion without refs or boxes etc. is now at 1,600+ characters. For some reason, the stat page still won't properly update so I used other tools to calculate it. The stat page is no longer having an issue reflecting accurate characters.⌚️ (talk) 15:35, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
No problems, ready for DYK. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 20:30, 10 April 2020 (UTC)