Template:Did you know nominations/James Gapes and Thomas Gapes

Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of James Gapes and Thomas Gapes's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 00:42, 22 April 2013 (UTC).

James Gapes, Thomas Gapes edit

James Gapes in 1882

Moved to mainspace by Schwede66 (talk). Self nominated at 09:30, 14 April 2013 (UTC).

1: Article Thomas Gapes, readable prose size 3,281 characters, PDF citation confirms hook, although it is not placed beside the actual claim. Good to go, Poeticbent talk 21:10, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
2: Article James Gapes, readable prose size 5,571 characters (948 words) also well referenced with hook supported by the same PDF inline source. Good to go. Please take a look at my ALT1 for grammar. Thanks, Poeticbent talk 21:10, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the review. ALT1 is indeed a much better hook, but you've swapped the father and son labels, which I have fixed. Schwede66 09:16, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

As this is a two article hook, before approval was given there should have been two QPQs listed (as per rule H4). Could you list a second QPQ, please? Thanks. SagaciousPhil - Chat 13:13, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

  • Thanks for noticing it, SagaciousPhil. Schwede66, would you please add a quick second review please? Poeticbent talk 13:54, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
  • I've added a second review. Schwede66 21:05, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
re-instate Poeticbent's DYKtick as my query has been addressed. SagaciousPhil - Chat 06:43, 21 April 2013 (UTC)