Template:Did you know nominations/James Dredge, Jr., James Dredge, Sr.

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:21, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

James Dredge, Jr., James Dredge, Sr.

edit

Created by Dr. Blofeld (talk), Rosiestep (talk), Charles Matthews (talk). Nominated by Rosiestep (talk) at 00:42, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Both created Jan 6 and nommed the 7th, so both meet newness. Sr. has 2014 characters (329 words) and Jr. has 3179 characters (517 words), so both meet size requirements. Both are neutral, though both have an excessive use of the word "notable" (which seems a bit peacockish). Citations seem to be in order and appear to be reliable. No evidence of copyvio or plagiarism. Hook is fine (153 chars). Unable to verify hook citation regarding paralysis as the referenced page 201 doesn't show for me in Google books (other pages in the book show up, but that page says it isn't available online). All three author-editors have established and good histories, so I'm fine with AGF if others are. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 08:13, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
  • I've removed overuse of the term "notable" from both articles. The sentence in the source reads: "Dredge in particular proved to be a worthy successor, and was actively involved in managing the journal until May 1903, when paralysis prevented him from continuing." --Rosiestep (talk) 17:32, 27 January 2013 (UTC)