Template:Did you know nominations/Friedrich Oberschelp

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 22:19, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Friedrich Oberschelp

5* expanded by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 11:44, 29 April 2022 (UTC).

  • I see that Friedrich Oberschelp is expanded 5x. It is new enough and long enough. Is Bielefelder Kinderchor included as a double nomination? I see that it was created on May 5th, in which case, I'm puzzled about how you were able to include it on this nomination, which would have had to occur by April 30th. 19:03, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
    When I wrote the nomination the choir and the hall were red links. I created both later. For the hall, I made a new nomination but for the choir, I didn't know what else to say. I will review another qpq. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:43, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
    Rachel, I reviewed now Template:Did you know nominations/Shepherd's hat as a second qpq. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:10, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
    Okay, I assume it's okay to have two new pages this way in the nomination, but I hadn't seen it before. I will start the review. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 21:31, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
    Friedrich Oberschelp: (New enough and long enough as mentioned above.) Earwig's copyvio detector didn't find any possible violations. I spot-checked sources, including German language ones through the use of Google translate. The sources support the statements that cite them and they are reliable. The page is neutral and within Wikipedia policy. The hook is supported by in-line citations in the body of the page; the Oberschelp page has them all. I approve the nomination.
    Rudolf-Oetker-Halle: New enough (created after the initial nomination as explained above) and long enough. The sources I saw on this concert hall from the Oberschelp page said Oetker Halle, but the official website says Rudolf-Oetker-Halle. I assume the name changed? Page is neutral with information supported by in-line citations. Spot-checking found that the sources were accurate and reliable. No close paraphrasing or copyvio found. QPQ done for both pages. The hook is supported by in-line citations in the body of the page; the Oberschelp page has them all. I approve the nomination and hook. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 21:52, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
    Rachel, this is sweet, but can you please review the choir? - The hall has already a review, or I'd say move it there. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
    Oops, my mistake. Bielefelder Kinderchor is new enough and long enough. It is neutral and cites reliable sources that spot-checks verified. No copyvios detected. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 17:33, 27 May 2022 (UTC)