Template:Did you know nominations/Frank Sinatra Christmas Collection

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 13:18, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Frank Sinatra Christmas Collection edit

5x expanded by Gatoclass (talk). Self-nominated at 09:08, 23 December 2015 (UTC).

  • Article was only 80 bytes of text before expansion (according to my tool) so easily 5x expanded. Hook is interesting and there is a citation to the Warners press release in the article, but it says the tracks have been previously unreleased on CD (which assumes 2 of the 3 had been released on vinyl). The copyvio bot is complaining about a 45% violation of http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/life/music/news/2004-11-30-xmas-music-sinatra_x.htm which is the quotation starting "This is not the kind of music that people at record companies...." so that could do with being trimmed down a bit. Also need a QPQ as previously stated. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:46, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for the quick review Ritchie333. Regarding the "unreleased" status, the Warner Bros. press release states that the album includes three previously unavailable tracks, so it seems clear they were not previously released on vinyl. As for the copyvio violation - regardless of what the bot says, it is nowhere near 45%, it's more like about 10% and well within fair use in my view, so perhaps you could reconsider? Gatoclass (talk) 10:32, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Okay, per your comment Ritchie333 I have altered the hook to say "three previously unavailable tracks", which is what the press release says. Gatoclass (talk) 11:39, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
I reduced the quote length a bit, how does it look now? Gatoclass (talk) 10:38, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Everything looks fine now, the hook is correct, the quotation has been reduced and the QPQ has been done. All good to go! Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:55, 23 December 2015 (UTC)