Template:Did you know nominations/Eyewitness memory

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:06, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Not enough expansion, enough expansion unlikely and possibly undesirable

Eyewitness memory

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• … that eyewitness memory, and therefore eyewitness testimony, is not particularly reliable?

• Comment: improved as part of class project

5x expanded by Blford (talk), Tamara Hill (talk). Nominated by Greta Munger (talk) at 19:24, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

• -Hook, source is fine. Expansion is ~1.5x (35622/234320)Smallman12q (talk) 13:25, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

• An article that is only 1.5x expanded is not eligible. The nomination can be revisited (or the article re-nominated) if it is substantially expanded in the future, but given the size of the article already that is not likely (and probably not desirable, given Wikipedia's guidelines on article length). rʨanaɢ (talk) 16:11, 23 October 2011 (UTC)