Template:Did you know nominations/Edward Kirk Warren

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Orlady (talk) 15:37, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Edward Kirk Warren

edit

Edward Kirk Warren

Created by Teemu08 (talk). Self nominated at 16:58, 30 December 2013 (UTC).

  • Looks good to me. --AdmrBoltz 02:53, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Hi Admrboltz, I'm afraid that this doesn't qualify as a QPQ, as you don't "indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed". Thanks, Matty.007 13:16, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
  • @Matty.007: Sorry, first time back to DYK in quite some time. The article is sufficiently long enough, its hook is cited, AGFing the citation as its from a book, its new so it didn't have to be 5x expanded. --AdmrBoltz 15:06, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
  • No damage done. (Not much point pinging, doesn't work in template space which is annoying.) Matty.007 15:08, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Admrboltz, you also have to click on the references and see if the article is closely paraphrasing what it says there. Yoninah (talk) 19:16, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
  • The hook is cited to a non-online source, so I can't do that. --AdmrBoltz 03:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Only two sources are not-online, and they pass the copyvio and dup tool. --AdmrBoltz 02:33, 5 January 2014 (UTC)