Template:Did you know nominations/Correctional nursing

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:39, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Nominator left a message on his talk page that he is unwilling to continue the nomination.

Correctional nursing edit

  • ... that nurses are the primary healthcare providers in correctional settings? Source: [1]

Created by Ifnord (talk). Self-nominated at 00:02, 3 August 2018 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

  • Adequate sourcing: No - n Each of the four paragraphs talking about the roles are unsourced.
  • Neutral: No - n Article primarily focuses on the roles in the same format as in the Forensic nursing link below.
  • Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: No - n There is plagiarism of this citation with Earwig saying 31.5% possible violation. Some of the sentences are duplicates e.g. "nurses screen inmates entering the facility...and necessity for chronic medications". Hook also closely paraphrases the BioMed reference in the first sentence of the journal article.

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: No - n not catchy in my opinion as the article name itself suggests the hook

Image eligibility:

QPQ: None required.

Invalid status ""maybe"" - use one of "y", "?", "maybe", "no" or "again"

This is my first DYK review. Please fell free to check it over. Primarily, the sourcing and plagiarism/neutrality are currently the main issues at the moment. The article mainly focuses on the roles of correctional nurses in the same format as the Forensic Nurses website. I think more information that talks about correctional nurses outside of their roles could be useful. On the other hand, there are sourcing and plagiarism issues with the included sources as seen above. I think if these three items are solved first, then the hook and picture could be tweaked afterwards based on the improved content. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:39, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Adding that a certain amount of piping is fine, but this - plain nurse - is too much. Also: the hook subject needs to be bold. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:54, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

The article has existing issues that have not been addressed. The nominator has been unable to respond to comments here despite being an active editor. As such, this nomination is now marked for closure, unless he responds to this message. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 07:30, 23 August 2018 (UTC)