Template:Did you know nominations/Bermuda fish chowder

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:39, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Bermuda fish chowder edit

Created/expanded by Shirt58 (talk). Self nom at 12:40, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

my appetite is there, but at present I see only 1453 chars of prose. Please add some spices. Also I guess you will have to do a review, right? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:59, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Problem: I don't like wordiness
Solution: Whereas the matter of Shirt58 v WP:DYK, of inst 5 March 2012 (UTC) and now under interlocutory motions as the matter of Shirt58 v WP:DYK, ex rel Gerda Arendt 12 March 2012 (UTC), those parties hereinafter respectively referred to as "the DYK nominator", "English language DYK nomination process" broadly construed, and "the intervenor"... I'll make it a little longer. :-) --Shirt58 (talk) 13:39, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Delicious. My English is limited, legal English even more so, thanks for improving it! :) I just nominated a (lost) Bach cantata - latish - if you are looking for something to review, BWV 80a :) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:47, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Hint: the lead should be a summary (no refs) of referenced statements in the article. Try that, it may be sufficient, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:21, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
spiced and sourced (sauced?), --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:40, 12 March 2012 (UTC)