- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:05, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
African humid period
edit
A rock painting depicting swimming people during the African humid period
Moved to mainspace by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk). Self-nominated at 10:31, 30 December 2018 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
|
|
|
Overall: 
Everything looks good to me; the article is well-cited and comprehensive, and all 3 hooks are valid, interesting, and verifiable. I am unsure, though, about the part in the main hook that states "the Sahara desert did not exist yet" as the article states that the Sahara did exist before the African Humid Period and subsequently disappeared - I'd suggest saying instead that the Sahara did not exist (or was smaller) and the region had a more humid climate. ComplexRational (talk) 02:15, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- I'd agree with the first hook suggestion saying "yet". Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:29, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- How is this different from the Neolithic Subpluvial, on which we already have an article (from which you have linked to here, btw)? On a quick look they seem duplicates, though I expect this is better. I can see you start this period earlier, but they end at the same time, no? Do we need to keep both articles? Johnbod (talk) 14:19, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Johnbod: I was thinking the same thing. Seems like "neolithic subpluvial" was the older name for the concept and now "African humid period" has become established. Perhaps start a merger discussion on Neolithic Subpluvial? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:22, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, you should. I'd put the GA nom on hold till then (or leave it queueing I suppose. Johnbod (talk) 16:26, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- I'll do this. Given the pace of GA reviews I suspect that the merger discussion will conclude much earlier, so I'll leave it queued. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:37, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Merge discussion was closed as "no consensus"; nomination can presumably be promoted at any time. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:16, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Everything looks good to me; the article is well-cited and comprehensive, and all 3 hooks are valid, interesting, and verifiable. I am unsure, though, about the part in the main hook that states "the Sahara desert did not exist yet" as the article states that the Sahara did exist before the African Humid Period and subsequently disappeared - I'd suggest saying instead that the Sahara did not exist (or was smaller) and the region had a more humid climate. ComplexRational (talk) 02:15, 5 January 2019 (UTC)