Template:Did you know nominations/2022 National Arena League season

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Z1720 (talk) 00:33, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

2022 National Arena League season

Created by Sportsfangnome (talk). Self-nominated at 19:31, 26 July 2022 (UTC).

  • I think the hook would probably look best like this:
  • BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:54, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
  • For the reviewer: If you want a source that is independent from the NAL, see here. BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:57, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
  • I think the hooks are interesting, however the word "during" might be better than "in". Preference for ALT0 - it is confirmed by references. The article is new enough and long enough. The correct inline citations are used. I have not discovered plagiarism however there are issues with attribution within the article, I will detail them below. Several items are simply referenced to a master schedule and not much can be determined by looking at it, (see below)
  1. During the season, there were two byes given out - not found in the reference.
  2. Use use the term "one platoon system" referenced to this reference, but it is not found there.
  3. " and there were only four referees left. I" not found in the reference.
  4. "with the exception of the Carolina Cobras and the Jacksonville Sharks, where they do not get a bye week" not found in the reference.
Bruxton (talk) 02:45, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Here is how the 3 makes the reference work. for 1, it used to be a link to this, [1] but it got changed to the playoffs, I will fix that, for the second one, I will fix that, the third one is already done, and the final one is like the first one.

This is not a review since Bruxton has already offered to review this, but wouldn't the currently-proposed hooks technically be a BLP violation? I understand neither person is named in the hook, but still. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 04:38, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
How would it be a BLP violation if no one is named? BeanieFan11 (talk) 13:27, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
"Does not focus unduly on negative aspects of living people"? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:46, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
For your third point, four officials were named in the reference ("Unfortunately, this resulted in only 4 officials remaining to work the second half.") BeanieFan11 (talk) 13:29, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
@BeanieFan11: Thanks I crossed that one out. Perhaps we can get an opinion about the BLP concern from @Schwede66:? Bruxton (talk) 15:39, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
No concerns from me. Schwede66 18:33, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Moving this message from Sportsfangnome from my talk page: I made the references fixed for it. Here is what I did.
  1. I fixed the link to the regular season, it shows that the teams had the byes.
  2. I got rid of the word.
  3. I fixed the link to the regular season again, it shows that the two teams didn't have a bye.

Sportsfangnome (talk) 23:58, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

I see one platoon is removed, for the other two I am probably just dense, I will AGF. Good to go Preference for ALT0. Bruxton (talk) 01:31, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Regarding the hook, is linking player necessary? Kpddg (talk) 13:45, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Good point Kpddg, I also unlinked referee. Bruxton (talk) 14:14, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ "Stats - National Arena League". www.nationalarenaleague.com. Retrieved 2022-07-28.