Template:Did you know nominations/2021 La Palma volcanic eruption
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 01:18, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
2021 La Palma eruption
The eruption on 20 September 2021
- ... that over 22,000 earthquakes occurred in the 8 days before the 2021 Cumbre Vieja volcanic eruption (pictured)? Source: Reuters
- ALT1:... that the Cumbre Vieja in La Palma has erupted for the first time since 1971 (pictured)? Source: Reuters
- ALT2:... that the 2021 Cumbre Vieja volcanic eruption (pictured) has forced the evacuation of thousands of La Palma residents? Source: Reuters
- ALT3:... that the 2021 Cumbre Vieja volcanic eruption (pictured) destroyed the town of Todoque, La Palma? Source: [1]
- Reviewed:
QPQ to comeTemplate:Did you know nominations/Talnotrie Hoard - Comment: This is an ongoing event, so the article will naturally change over time. I nominated it for 'In The News' on 19 September, but it seems unlikely that it will appear there. Since that nomination, @Vacamiera: started a new article, so a DYK is now possible.
- Reviewed:
Created by Vacamiera (talk) and many more. Nominated by Mike Peel (talk) at 19:25, 24 September 2021 (UTC).
- ALT1 interests me, but I think "before"
iswas a mistake. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:40, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- @InedibleHulk: Thanks for spotting that, it was a copyediting error. Fixed. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:56, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- You're welcome. InedibleHulk (talk) 21:00, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- ALT1 interests me, but I think "before"
- The article is now 'In the news' as an 'Ongoing' event. I think that makes this DYK nomination ineligible; if so, please could someone close it? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:36, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- AFAIK an article featured in ITN only becomes ineligible if it's a bolded link. If it's just mentioned in Ongoing events then it should still be eligible, similar to how articles featured on Recent deaths can still appear on DYK. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:25, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
This nomination still needs a QPQ. Please see RfC on excessively late supply of QPQ credits which agreed on a timeline of one week to do so. Flibirigit (talk) 16:54, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Flibirigit: QPQ done, I didn't do one earlier as I wasn't sure whether this would get anywhere. Also, that RfC should really be linked to from WP:QPQ, this is the first I've heard of it. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:46, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- It's also mentioned in WP:DYK itself. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 18:27, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for doing the QPQ. A full review is still needed. Best wishes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flibirigit (talk • contribs) 18:55, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Flibirigit: Thanks, looking forward to the rest of your review! @Narutolovehinata5: Aah, it's in the footnote rather than the main text! I missed that. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:04, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- I did not commit to doing a full review. Anyone else is welcome to review. Best wishes. Flibirigit (talk) 02:21, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Flibirigit: Thanks, looking forward to the rest of your review! @Narutolovehinata5: Aah, it's in the footnote rather than the main text! I missed that. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:04, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- It's also mentioned in WP:DYK itself. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 18:27, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Flibirigit: QPQ done, I didn't do one earlier as I wasn't sure whether this would get anywhere. Also, that RfC should really be linked to from WP:QPQ, this is the first I've heard of it. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:46, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
@Vacamiera and Mike Peel: Starting afresh. This interesting article is new enough and long enough. The image is suitably licensed, the hook facts are cited inline and the article is neutral. I detected one copyright issue; the first paragraph in the "Previous eruptions" section is copied directly from this source. I have removed a sentence with two tags, but there remains a "citation needed" tag in another. A QPQ has been done. Things have moved on, so how about a new hook connected with the unfortunate village of Todoque? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:35, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: Thanks for the review! The paragraph with the copyright issue has been reworded. I removed the other sentence with a citation needed tag. I've added ALT3 about Todoque. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 13:13, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. This is now good to go with any of the hooks. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:06, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Promoter's comment to @Mike Peel and Cwmhiraeth: I've modified the credits—take a look at the relevant prep to see how.
- AFAIK an article featured in ITN only becomes ineligible if it's a bolded link. If it's just mentioned in Ongoing events then it should still be eligible, similar to how articles featured on Recent deaths can still appear on DYK. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:25, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
ALT0 to T:DYK/P1