Talk:Zoran Kalabić

Sourcing

This article is overly reliant on ref 1, a primary source. LizardJr8 (talk) 03:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

multiple issues

this article does contain multiple issues. I will list them here. if the main author does not fix these issues, I will aggressively delete the offending texts.

• He is the recipient of recognitions and awards for business success
• Zoran Kalabić is a great humanist
• the list of donations is measureless
• as well as many other cultural, artistic and educational events
• the main support in his life and success
• Thanks to his reputation and influence
• Kalabić is the owner of many awards given by world organizations and associations
• He is also the recipient of numerous declarations and other recognitions for humanity

Good day—RetroCosmos ^talk 04:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

@User:RetroCosmos this is all very well spotted. All of those are remove or fixed now. Please check it and thank you. --Pane.Vino.Wiki (talk) 22:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

The article is still very far from neutral. I only quoted maybe a tenth of issues. There's not much I can say that's not a repeat of WP:NPOV. Good day—RetroCosmos ^talk 17:10, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Ok, thank you very much, User:David notMD came and helped a lot with further information's, and i am here also for anything else. Happy to follow your work and learn. Also, why cannot we add external links? All articles have official website of the person in question. --Pane.Vino.Wiki (talk) 18:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

You already have an external link in the infobox. External links have rules surrounding them. WP:ELNO Good day—RetroCosmos ^talk 18:56, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

But i must say i disagree, every possible person i see on Wiki have official website both in infobox and below. in this WP:ELMO, very first bolded sentence is Except for a link to an official page of the article's subject so i would love to see website as in every other wiki article about living person. --Pane.Vino.Wiki (talk) 19:01, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

My interpretation of WP:ELMIN is that adding more than one ext link to an article is reserved for very narrow cases, and that the other wiki articles you speak of are in violation. Good day—RetroCosmos ^talk 19:54, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

I understand your point and i would love to explain where i think that you maybe missed it a bit. WP:ELMIN and WP:ELMO talks only about external links, and not about articles. I have searched now, and found MOS:INFOBOX where you can see: An infobox is a panel, .... that summarizes key facts about the page's subject. So, Elmo talks about only one official website link, but only in the external links, while MOS:INFOBOX suggest that we should add it there also, as it summarizes the subject of the article. Can i kindly ask to reintroduce the website and the official link section, please? It would make article nicer and more presentable. --Pane.Vino.Wiki (talk) 20:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

WP:ELMIN and WP:ELMO talks only about external links, and not about articles I'm going to stop you right here and ask that you reread the content guideline. And then I will ask you to think about whether what you just said makes any sense.

I'll say this. From an encyclopedic point of view this article has a million problems, and whether an external link is placed only in the infobox, or both in the external links section and infobox, or just in the external links is not one of them. In other words, it is pointless arguing and a waste of everyone's time. Good day—RetroCosmos ^talk 22:32, 30 March 2024 (UTC)