Talk:Zig and Zag (puppets)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Fair use rationale for Image:Zig&Zag.jpg

edit
 

Image:Zig&Zag.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Video (nothing to do with toast) Does anyone rememer that? I'd add it to the article if I could rememver anything about it..

Tubridy Tonight appearance

edit

This hardly seems notable. This was neither a recurring slot nor a one off special but rather an interview. It was quite representative of their standard routine but does not merit a section of its own. I imagine this is only present because it occurred recently. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.16.33.24 (talk) 11:20, 13 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think it was their first television interview in a decade or some number of years. --➨Candlewicke  :) Sign/Talk 17:48, 17 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Tone of article

edit

This article appears to be written "in-universe", in suggesting that these puppets are actually aliens with their own free will. To someone looking for basic information about the characters, this comes across as complete nonsense. I think this article needs a serious cleanup. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.193.123.225 (talk) 15:02, 25 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

That's exactly right. Actual information is hidden, while fictional material is foregrounded. As well as perspective, it lacks neutrality.Alistair Stevenson (talk) 23:54, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
This is bad. The tone is typically Irish - even if I didn't know who it was about!--Tuzapicabit (talk) 00:46, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Zig and Zag (puppets). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply