| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zenon Panoussis redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Tagging edit
Tagged for no citations, no WP:RS, only WP:OR. This article has been typed off Wikipedia and a copy/paste job done five years ago without anyone adding anything verifiable about it. COFS 01:15, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- It's described at http://www.xenu.net/archive/events/zenon/ Other links exists[1][2][3][4]. The case was high profile so there was many newspaper articles written about him. // Liftarn
- Thanks. But you have not put in ONE of them. So I re-tagged it to invite some more people to do something about it. WP:ATTRIB says "Original research refers to material that is not attributable to a reliable, published source. This includes unpublished facts, arguments, ideas, statements, and neologisms; and any unpublished analysis or synthesis of published material that appears to advance a position. Material added to articles must be directly and explicitly supported by the cited sources." and "Note the difference between unsourced material and original research: Unsourced material is material not yet attributed to a reliable source. It is unattributed. Original research is material that cannot be attributed to a reliable source. It is unattributable. The only way to demonstrate that material is not original research is to cite reliable sources that provide information directly related to the topic of the article, and to adhere to what those sources say". This article is 100% Original Research or Unattributed Material, I wouldn't know as there are 0% sources in the article. COFS 21:45, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
I saw you did a lot of drive by tagging. // Liftarn