Talk:Zapiekanka/GA1
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Carbrera in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Carbrera (talk · contribs) 21:14, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I am Carbrera, and I'll be reviewing this article for possible good article submission.
Full review coming very soon. Carbrera (talk) 21:14, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Infobox
edit- Perhaps the alt for the image could better describe the dish; perhaps say what is on the zapiekanka (cheese, mushrooms, etc.)
- Is ketchup an absolutely essential ingredient? Is not; please move that to the 'minor ingredient' list portion
Lead
edit- Is the 'A' necessary before 'zapiekanka'?
- The 'optionally other ingredients' part reads awkwardly; could this be rephrased for better coherence?
Etymology
edit- Insert a comma after 'combine'
- Remove 'any of' in the sentence 'and may refer to any of various casseroles...'
- The last sentence sorta indicates WP:OR; please provide a source for this statement and remove 'as used in this article' for better coherence
Preparation and varieties
editParagraph 1
edit- Replace 'classic no-frills' with 'typical'
- I get that this lead sentence is factual, but no source backs up what you're trying to convey
- Again, the second sentence does not have a source either
- And again, the final sentence doesn't have a source either
Paragraph 2
edit- The second sentence indicates WP:OR; remove this sentence altogether please
- The remainder of this section is pretty good
History
editParagraph 1
edit- In the beginning of this section as a whole, there are very few sources to back up what is being said; I'm sure you could find a few to put in here to make your statements credible
- The last sentence could be condensed while still providing the same overall message
Paragraph 2
edit- The lead sentence again sounds a bit bias; rephrase please
- The 'cult following' sentence needs a source to back up such a heavy statement
- The 'nightlife' hub' sentence needs a source as well
References
edit- I'm confused as to why there are two separate sections for the exact same thing; the 'Sources' section needs to be combined with this for a better flow
- This article uses shortened footnotes, which requires separate sections for footnotes and full citations. — Kpalion(talk) 11:25, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Is there an available template to add to this page? The ending looks rather bland
End of GA Review:
editA very decent article, but some improvements need to be made before passing GA. I'm gonna place this article on hold until the nominator has a chance to look through my comments. I hope I wasn't too strict in this review; I just want the article to be at its best before passing. Thanks. Carbrera (talk) 21:34, 20 March 2016 (UTC)