Talk:Year-round school in the United States

Wikipedia Ambassador Program assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Ball State University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q2 term. Further details are available on the course page.

Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}} on 15:33, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Montana State University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Spring term.

Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}} on 15:33, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 10 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): OliviaJobe, Slmathews, Msantiago2001.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:16, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 10 December 2018

}} 67.218.119.177 (talk) 17:45, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 February 2019

I would like to edit this webpage. I have edited many pages before and I would like to edit this one too. As I also know a lot about this subject and understand year round holidays in the us 5.32.62.6 (talk) 08:04, 3 February 2019 (UTC) jfrhv vhbv fjhvbfv d fvjhdkjvnhvdbv vdbhvbjhbvjknvhdfbv vbhbnhbfvnjhb

Not done. Format is not "change X to Y". Besides, you are a vandal.Sjö (talk) 09:28, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Recent edits

This edit had an edit summary saying it was plagiarized information. This is the second time that this particular editor has removed this cited information stating that this quote is plagiarized, but quotes are allowed as long as they are clearly delineated/marked as such and as long as the source is cited, etc. So, maybe I am wrong, but here it is: I'd like for the editor who removed the content to exactly state how the following material

A 2016 review published by New York City Teachers College Press summarized the research on year-round schools as follows

The effects of year-round calendars on test scores...once thought to be positive...now appear to be neutral at best. Although year-round calendars do increase summer learning, they reduce learning at other times of year, so that the total amount learned over a 12-month period is no greater under a year-round calendar than under a nine-month calendar. [There is also] evidence that year-round calendars make it harder to recruit and retain experienced teachers, make it harder for mothers to work outside the home, and reduce property values.

is "plagiarized". Reply here. On the article's talk page. I'm willing to be taught. Shearonink (talk) 04:10, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Shearonink, you are correct; I've restored the removed material. With quotation marks (or an indented block quote, which serves the same purpose), WP:INTEXT attribution, and a citation, this is clearly not plagiarism. One can argue whether it's WP:FAIRUSE (see WP:NFCCP and "Minimal usage"), but it looks fine to me on that score, as well. Whether the words are sufficiently representative, or relevant, or from an important enough source to merit a quotation of this length, can all be argued on either side. In my opinion, your paragraph was fine as is. The Wiki Ed students have a module that warns about plagiarism more than once, and the student may be going overboard a little here in reaction to that. Pinging User:Shalor (Wiki Ed). Hope this helps, Mathglot (talk) 05:22, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. Actually it wasn't my paragraph per se, someone else wrote it. This article is on my Watchlist because of ongoing vandalism that occurs from time to time - I saw that the content & sourcing was removed w/the plagiarism edit summary, restored it explaining why, and subsequently it was then removed a second time (with another "plagiarism" edit summary) without any discussion from the other editor on this talk page. I hesitated to restore it a second time because of WP:3RR/edit warring concerns. Shearonink (talk) 15:19, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

source

References

Semi-protected edit request on 10 October 2024

71.40.125.11 (talk) 16:19, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

this website is an opinion

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. PianoDan (talk) 16:29, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Both indefinite?

ymblanter and/or sdrqaz, you've made changes to the article's protection settings exactly a month ago. However, it seems that somebody has 4gotten to set a time-limit to either protection. To whomever it may concern, please take the decision based on the article's log history.197.244.115.127 (talk) 10:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

I deliberately protected the article for an indefinite duration. Ymblanter (talk) 11:24, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

IP, I only removed the auto-confirmed move protection because it was useless (all pages require editors to be auto-confirmed to move them). Ymblanter, you have indefinite pending changes and semi-protection at the same time, which are redundant. Perhaps you could lift one of them? The frequency of disruption is probably a bit low for semi-protection. Thanks, Sdrqaz (talk) 22:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Ok, now I had a look and figured out what I really wanted to do. I think I wanted finite-time semi-protection (probably a week or smth), and pending changes which would take over when the semi-protection has expired. Smth went wrong and I imposed indeed two redundant protections. I now lifted the semi-protection and left pending changes, I hope it should be ok now. Ymblanter (talk) 22:34, 30 October 2024 (UTC)