Talk:Xandros

- Hi, I am considering using Xandros on my broken PC. The problem with my broken PC is that it lost it's hard drive (not detected) and I have another one I am going to put in it. I have the Xandros cd and I was wondering if after I put in my new hard drive, pop in Xandros and install it, what would I need to do? I have never even used Linux before and I don't know the commands or anything like that. And because Xandros isn't live, I can't try it out. Please send me an e-mail at webmaster@onsitedas.com.

Untitled

Thanks, WonderingAboutLinux

Maybe someone could make a screenshot of Xandros' typical file browser. --Michiel Sikma 6 July 2005 22:33 (UTC)

"It is the creator of one of the easiest to use and popular distributions of Linux called Xandros Desktop."
This statement sounds biased and possibly incorrect. Ease of use is subjective and is Xandros really one of the most popular linux distros? I think this should perhaps be reworded to
"It is the creator of the Xandros Desktop which aims to provide ease of use to a mainstream audience." 195.60.16.190 03:20, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

KDE binary incompatibility

Maybe it should be mentioned that the version of KDE included is unique in that you can't run binaries downloaded from anywhere other than Xandros Netowrks. You need to compile from source otherwise.

GNOME program Speed

"It has been discovered that GNOME-native programs boot up and run faster on Xandros when GNOME is being used as the GUI." I'm not sure this sentence is really objective, without providing some real references. --hub 21:21, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Product Activation

The way the product activation works on Xandros is not what is described. No hardware check is performed unlike on Windows. It is only related to the serial number... It should also be noted that this does not prevent apt-get to work -- hub 15:04, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Cost

I modified the cost section as the issue in the Linux community is not actual cost but freedom, as in free speech that is at issue in the community. If a company produces open source software they are following the ideals of the free software movement even if they charge for it. Xandros fails to comply with any of the ideals of the community, although they do release from what I hear some code, presumably to benefit themselves as otherwise they would have to maintain a separate code base. The issue is that they do not release all source code under an open source license that they create. Other companies like Linspire release (as of recent) all source code they create under open source licenses. Linspire does not completely comply with the ideals of the free software foundation in that they bundle third party proprietary software that is deemed necessary for usability of a non-technical users. Then you have more mainstream community distributions such Debian, Gentoo, Slackware, Freespire (OSS edition), Fedora, OpenSUSE, and others that do not include third party prorpitary software and are in full compliance. I'm unaware of any commercial distribution that doesn't include any in-house or 3rd party proprietary software, however Novell's commercial distribution may be the first such case and I may be missing some others that I'm just not aware of.

Compatability with deb packages

Since Xandros is debian based does that mean it is compatable with deb instal packages? How about rpms? These are important to be considered in the article, espiesially since with programs (such as Opera) that have a Linux and Windows version will run better with the proper Linux version than running the windows version in crossover. A package is theoretically easier for new users than using a tar. Kc4 22:19, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Reason for Criticism

Under the Criticism heading I changed the subhead from "Free Software" to "Proprietary Software" since the former doesn't accurately reflect the reason for the criticism (no-one's criticising the company for providing free software).AncientBrit 06:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Xandros desktop.png

Image:Xandros desktop.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:33, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Xandros OCE edition is NOT discontinued

However the download links arent very visible, and the torrent file for it is literally hidden, but Xandros 4 OCE exists, and is indeed available just like Xandros 3 OCE did

It exists: http://forums.support.xandros.com/viewtopic.php?p=177932&highlight=&sid=378698218c4f2331b8d0f4e5afbb1b6c

Download links are real and legitimate: http://forums.xandros.com/viewtopic.php?p=194426&sid=2aec49446147f753b3cd1d2ff167050f

--Omega Said 08:48, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Xandros 4.5 OCE is latest

The article states the Xandros 4.1 is the latest version of the OCE. However, the source it links to ([1]) states:

There's also a newer version, called 4.5, which you can get here:

http://www.geekconnection.org/xandros_4.5/SDK-2008.03.03_06.30-4.5-oc-i386_cdr.iso

The 4.1 version is older, and if you have new hardware, it may not have all the drivers you need. The 4.5 version is the latest from Xandros, and should work better with newer hardware.

Jim

Can someone make the relevant adjustments? --Waqas1987 (talk) 13:02, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Xandros. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090330052345/http://interopvendoralliance.org:80/Directory.aspx to http://interopvendoralliance.org/Directory.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Xandros. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081106041820/http://wiki.eeeuser.com:80/howto:getkde to http://wiki.eeeuser.com/howto:getkde
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20030203111601/http://www.xandros.com:80/ to http://www.xandros.com/
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110227031427/http://www.bridgeways.ca/ to http://www.bridgeways.ca/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:15, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Xandros. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://forums.xandros.com/viewtopic.php?p=64889
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030203111601/http://www.xandros.com/about/corporatebackground.html to http://www.xandros.com/about/corporatebackground.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 7 December 2017 (UTC)