Talk:Working Man

Rita MacNeil

Should there be some sort of message at the top pointing out that this is not the Rita MacNeil song? Le Douche? But of course! (talk) 03:22, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

I always create articles for songs so other people can add onto the information—if I don't know about the song, I let people who do help me. Hyukan 06:37, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

If that' your intent place the expand tag. I'll do it. Yanksox 01:40, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

The first Pinch harmonics

During the quote "extended jam" in the middle of the song, I believe Alex Lifeson makes use of the guitar technique known as "pinch harmonics." These would be the squeaky noises you hear. To my knowledge this is the first time pinch harmonics were used in Heavy metal, or music as a whole. If someone could see if there's an article on this on the net, it weould be greatly apreciated, or if I find one, I'll add it and site it. --Holamitch (talk) 23:54, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Ok, so, I found a source, I'm gonna add the info. If you have a problem with me saying this is the first time pinch harmonics were used in popular/modern music, please read the source info, AND THEN contact me XD. --Holamitch (talk) 23:54, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

nn link/author fails WP:RS. Libs 00:15, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Rush self titled.jpg

The image Image:Rush self titled.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:53, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

What?

(Perhaps I should have titled this section Eh? instead. But seriously...)

An excerpt from the fourth paragraph in the main section at the time this was written: "...while the other is a previously unreleased released master track..." I don't see how it can possibly be both. Perhaps this was written as intended but it certainly makes the brain stumble as one reads it. I tend to think that "released" was left in erroneously, but I'll leave it to another to make the edit as I can't be sure. WavSlave (talk) 20:05, 22 February 2016 (UTC)