Talk:White Eagles (paramilitary)
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Anna Comnena in topic Added new information on their reappearance
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the White Eagles (paramilitary) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criminals edit
This Group are criminals and are Cowards end of story. --Marbus2 5 17:06, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Members of the group have been tried and convicted of criminal charges. Do you have a reference for cowards? --Bejnar 20:07, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
They have no connection with Seselj edit
Beli Orlovi weren't organized by Vojislav Seselj or Serbian Radical Party.This formation was organized by Vuk Draskovic and Serbian Renewal Movement.This is huge mistake and I hope that somebody should fix this.Vojislav Seselj very often condemn members of Beli Orlovi during his trial in Hague. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zakipfc (talk • contribs) 00:58, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
- The article says that the White Eagles were formed by by Dragoslav Bokan and Mirko Jović and provides citations. The article also provides citation to neutral, published works that link the Serbian National Renewal and the Serbian Radical Party with the formation of the White Eagles. It also states, with citation, that Vojislav Seselj denies that linkage. It presents the controversy in a neutral way. --Bejnar (talk) 01:35, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- If you have reliable published sources that indicate that Vuk Draskovic organized the White Eagles, please provide them. --Bejnar (talk) 01:35, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Added new information on their reappearance edit
I added new information at the bottom of the article, if anyone thinks the information should be placed on a different part of the article, go ahead :). —Anna Comnena (talk) 14:44, 14 December 2010 (UTC)