| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
This clearly satisfies notability criteria for music (esp. point 5.) Barbara Osgood 16:57, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- (Here's a link to point 5) The way the article is written now, I don't think it quite meets point 5, as the only record label in this article that has an article is O Rosa Records, which is a redirect, so I have no way to judge if any of the labels are important indie labels. Also, they have only released one record on that label and the threshold is two.
- 5. Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable).
- I don't know enough to judge the importance of the record labels or the band, and don't have time to go a bunch of googling to check this out. It is up to the article to display notability through the use of sources other than the band's myspace page, etc. Some outside reviews from various reliable sources would certainly help. Good luck, I don't plan to persue this, but I suspect this will come up again. Katr67 19:30, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
I'll get to work on this article. --> 7+1 13:01, 10 June 2007 (UTC)