Talk:Washington State Route 20 Spur
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Dough4872 in topic GA Review
 | Washington State Route 20 Spur was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Delisted good article | |||||||||||||
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Merge
editThis article should really be merged into Washington State Route 20... --Rschen7754 (T C) 17:12, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 20 Spur/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Comments:
- If SR 20 Spur is officially designated along the ferries, then is the ferry terminal truly the northern terminus?
- Yes, changed to reflect ferry terminus and land terminus.
- Is it relevant to mention traffic counts from 1970?
- No, removed.
- Can some more information about the physical surroundings the route passes through be added to the route description?
- Yes, done.
- Is there enough information in this article to justify a standalone article. Like other Washington spur routes, the information here may better be presented in the SR 20 article.
- Unlike other spur routes, SR 20 Spur is 7 miles in length and has a seperate history from SR 20. SR 20, before 1964, was multiple highways and SR 20 Spur was one highway, which became SR 536 and SR 20 Spur. SR 20 was, before 1973, SR 525, SR 20, SR 30, SR 294 and SR 31, so it would be harder to merge; SR 20 is 436 miles in length and has a long history starting in 1893 and would need more than a section in the article to include the spur route.
I am placing the article on hold. Dough4872 (talk) 17:18, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- Done –CG 18:15, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- Since your rationale for proving for this to be a separate article is sufficient, along with the other fixes made, I will pass the article. Dough4872 (talk) 13:27, 8 August 2009 (UTC)