This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California articles
I don't understand why this keeps getting blanked--not being a secondary source is not intrinsically a problem for material included in an entry. It can be an argument for why the entry itself should be deleted, but under WP:NACADEMIC it may not apply here. Unless a valid argument can be advanced for why the material's inappropriate to include in the entry, it should be restored. Innisfree987 (talk) 18:27, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
I agree. The lack of secondary sources might be a reason to nominate the article for deletion but it's not a valid reason to remove, say, a list of papers the subject has published. There's no requirement that all information within an article must have a secondary source, particularly with something self-evident such as the fact that the subject published a paper. Hut 8.5 20:30, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Oh, if I had a dollar for every time a new editor removes a primary source, citing the title of WP:SECONDARY without even reading the first sentence... 8-( Andy Dingley (talk) 20:34, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
