Talk:Vortigern and Rowena

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

King Arthur Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject King Arthur, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of King Arthur, the Arthurian era and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.King ArthurWikipedia:WikiProject King ArthurTemplate:WikiProject King ArthurKing Arthur articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shakespeare Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of William Shakespeare on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShakespeareWikipedia:WikiProject ShakespeareTemplate:WikiProject ShakespeareShakespeare articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Section labeled Text v Plot

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The problem with text is that it implies some type of heavier reading whereas we are simply giving a plot summary. I did a little searching among Shakespeare's actual plays and here is how they label similar sections:

Richard III- Synopsis

A Midsummer Night's Dream - Synopsis

Romeo and Juliet- Synopsis

So I think we should change the section to synopsis, I think that implies more of what both of us is working towards. I did the same with Sources.SADADS (talk) 23:56, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

That's much better. Your previous version with the capitalized letters was not preferred, perthe guideline.--Cúchullain ^t/c 12:24, 7 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic