Talk:Volkswagen T-Roc

Latest comment: 1 year ago by SalvaStalker in topic Categorisation in sources

Categorisation in sources edit

A quick skim through Google Search results for "Volkswagen T-Roc review" in Anglophone regions where the car was sold reveals the following:

  • The Independent call it a "car", a "compact SUV" and "actually a hatch on stilts".
  • The Sunday Times call it a "car" and a "jacked-up Golf".
  • The Irish Examiner call it a "car" and a "'compact' SUV".
  • Car Zone call it a "small SUV" and a "car".
  • The RAC call it a "compact SUV", a "hatch", a "hot hatch", a "cabriolet", and of course, a "car", while noting that "it's supposed to appeal to customers who want something larger than a supermini-based crossover".
  • Car Expert call it a "small SUV" and a "car".
  • Top Gear magazine call it a "tall Golf", a "family crossover", a "tall car", and a "hatchback".
  • Complete Car call it a "car", a "compact family SUV", and a "crossover".
  • Cars Guide call it a "compact SUV", a "car", and a "small SUV".
  • Changing Lanes call it a "crossover", an "SUV", "a slightly elevated hatchback with gorgeous coupé-like styling", and a "car".
  • Autocar call it a "crossover hatchback", "a more regular-sized hatchback", a "crossover", and a "car".
  • What Car? call it a "small SUV", a "sports SUV", a "car", and "one of the wider cars in the class".
  • Auto Express call it a "small SUV", "compact SUV", and a "car".
  • Car Wow call it a "car" and a "compact SUV".
  • Parker's Car Guides call it a "car" and a "small SUV".

I see absolutely no evidence of the "subcompact" claim made in this article and thus will remove it promptly. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 14:13, 27 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

@HumanBodyPiloter5
I strongly agree, there's no way a 4.5m long SUV is a B-segment car.
Do the B-segment have an upper limit for length or wheelbase? SalvaStalker (talk) 21:13, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply