There are no any proves that city existed before 1108

edit

"Vladimir, without country designation, under 990, i.e. during the introduction of Christianity, and believing that in evidence of the oldest chronicle, under the name of the founder of the city, the great Vladimir, one should mean St. Vladimir. This is the last the evidence really refers to the city of Vladimir on Klyazma, but it recorded in the chronicle under 1176 and it further states that in this at the time the city was still new, which could not be said if it had been founded in 990, and therefore in the great Vladimir cannot be recognized Vladimir St. What about the news of 990 about the construction Vladimir St. mountains Vladimir, then undoubtedly it was Vladimi Volynsky 4), in which the Church of the Mother of God actually existed, built by Vladimir St., whereas in Vladimir on Klyazma There was no Church of the Mother of God before the construction of one. Andrew in 1160 All this leads to the conclusion that in the Nikon Chronicle, as well as in others one with her categories, which were compiled in Muscovite Rus' at a time when Vladimir Volynsky was in the possession of Lithuania for a long time and the memory of him was lost in the north, the compilers mixed up the news, and everything that concerned this city was attributed by them to Vladimir on Klyazma", - A. Bunin About the time of the founding of the city of Vladimir on Klyazma According to the book Archaeological news and notes published by the Moscow Archaeological Society. - M., 1898. Nos. 5-6, pp. 179-189. https://web.archive.org/web/20180216064601/http://www.russiancity.ru/dbooks/d28.htm 93.127.69.222 (talk) 00:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply