Talk:Vipava Valley

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Eleassar in topic Misleading photo

Misleading photo

edit

The photograph depicts the village of Branik which is NOT in Vipava Valley but rather in the parallel Branica Valley. I would suggest to present an alternative photograph instead. MarkoD (talk) 12:06, 13 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Has been replaced. --Eleassar my talk 13:32, 19 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
I have nothing against the replacement, but just for the record: Branica Valley is part of the Vipava Valley. Any reference will confirm this. Viator slovenicus (talk) 12:50, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
As far as I have Google checked the sources, Branik Valley is not part of the Vipava Valley. They're always juxtaposed. Can you provide a source to confirm your statement? --Eleassar my talk 09:17, 21 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Let's start with this (includes a map), this; and this one; or this one. I could continue endlessly like this. Also check the Slovene wikipedia: sl:Branik. Can you please revert all the changes you made in this regard (in the articles on Nevin Birsa, Branik, etc.): the Branica Valley is not really a valley (more of a transitory canyon), and it's unlikely to ever get a wp page in English (it doesn't even have one in Slovene). Viator slovenicus (talk) 14:54, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Ok, thanks for having provided the sources. I'll include a bit of material discussing the microregionalization of Vipava Valley as described at [1] (pg.7) and revert the changes to the articles. I'll also redirect Branik Valley and Branica Valley here. --Eleassar my talk 15:39, 23 October 2009 (UTC)Reply