| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Victor Magtanggol article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
"Edit Warring" with A GMA employee about "Fan Criticism" edit
So I added a content about the inspiration of the show Victor Magtanggol, which is derived from Norse Mythology, as cited from http://entertainment.inquirer.net/282799/victor-magtanggol-based-norse-mythology-not-marvels-thor-says-creator
The citation is valid and the content is focused on the inspiration and source material of the show, not the fan criticism per se.
Two Wikipedia accounts apparently owned by one person removed the content even after I revise it.
User:Hotwiki and User:Sakura8090
It can be said that they are both owned by one person because Sakura8090 first removed the content then Hotwiki removed it again, with the keyword "Again" in the edit summary:
Again, what fans think is irrelevant here, they are not critics. Read the freaking Manual of Style!
After revising the content and removing any trace of "fan criticism" the sockpuppet still removed the content with what looks like a threat:
Undid revision 850074740 by NoNDeSCRiPT (talk) even if you removed the description "fan criticism", it is still fan criticism, revert one more time and you'll be reported for disruptive editing!
Yet, the user Hotwiki is the one who violated the three-edit rule by editing the article more than three times after reverting contents.
A check on the User page of Hotwiki makes it apparent that he/she is directly or indirectly employed by the show's creator, GMA Entertainment, as shown by the heavy amount of pages the account is watching/managing that are related to GMA Entertainment, the same creator of Victor Magtanggol. This potentially violates several Wikipedia rules as well as neutrality of the article. This could also be the reason that the editor is being unnecessarily aggressive towards other contributors to the page.
NoNDeSCRiPT (talk) 13:21, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Okay now you accusing me I'm Sakura8090 because you were reverted? That's hilarious. Go contact an administrator for an IP check and learn how wrong you are with your false accusations. First you don't know how to follow manual of style, then you go accuse editors of such things. Hotwiki (talk) 13:29, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Also I don't work for GMA Entertainment. What is this? I edited a lot of articles regarding GMA shows and that already makes an employee of GMA Network? And is there a rule that GMA network employees can't edit articles regarding GMA shows? Your behavior is inappropriate, and I suggest you stop attacking editors.Hotwiki (talk) 13:41, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Theme song edit
Please note that the infobox (Infobox television) calls for a theme song used in the opening credits. Not just the primary song in the series' OST / most associated with the series. The exact phrase in the usage instruction of the infobox is:
opentheme = The name of the opening theme for the show.
— Infobox television : Usage guideline for the "opentheme" parameter
Superhero Mo by Exbatallion is indeed the theme song but it is still uncertain that it will be the opening theme song. If the IP editor/s happen to have insider information that indeed the song will be used in the opening credits (since at the time of this post, Victor Magtanggol has yet to air) that would be original research, and would have to be backed by reliable sources not to be as such.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 17:32, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Criticism edit
the criticism section should be added that bunch of people criticise this movie for copying the Marvel movies like thor. source [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jigjolly (talk • contribs)