Talk:Very large floating structure

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 2A02:AA7:4603:BEC2:DCF2:40D2:C1F1:EF06 in topic Poorly Worded Section

Iceberg aircraft carrier edit

Doesn't Project Habakkuk, the British plan to build a huge iceberg-like floating aircraft platform to base in the Mid-Atlantic to fight U-boats during WWII, count as a variation of a VLFS? Or does the fact that it's made from ice mean it can't count as a "structure". It's made by man, out of a mixture of ice and wood pulp called Pykrete, so it's not naturally occurring. And I recall it being pretty big....45Colt 09:30, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Very large floating structure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Poorly Worded Section edit

This bit here:

Air-cushion supported Mega-Floaters are mega floaters that are supported by an air cushion. They were invented by Jan Van Kessel of TU Delft.

It would be better to just say: Air-cushion supported Mega-Floaters were invented by Jan Van Kessel of TU Delft.

The first sentence is 100% redundant and doesn't provide meaningful information. Maybe if it were describing their operation or providing additional information, but it's just restating the same thing twice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.93.55.246 (talk) 20:58, 31 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

:The main problem with this entire thing is that Jan Van Kessel didn't invent air-cushion support, and doesn't claim to have done so. In his paper, he lists many different projects that have used the approach in the past. He just designed a specific implementation of the concept, the shoebox implementation. However, his shoebox implementation is very similar to the air cushion ship designs and patents by Sir John Isaac Thornycroft dating from the 1870's. For this reason I have removed the sentence.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:AA7:4603:BEC2:DCF2:40D2:C1F1:EF06 (talk) 12:22, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply