 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Proposal for merger with vasectomy reversal
editThese two articles cover the same material. vasectomy reversal redirects to Vasovasostomy but this article very adequately covers both vasovasostomy and vasoepidiymostomy. In Australia, at least, the usual term is vasectomy reversal rather than reverse vasectomy.Porturology (talk) 02:28, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- The merger discussion should take place in only one place. Before I found this comment on merger I had already fixed the merge templates to point at the other discussion, so please discuss there Talk:Vasovasostomy#Merge with Reverse vasectomy. Zodon (talk) 05:05, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Tone
editWhy is the section "choosing a surgeon" presented as if it were some sort of tabloid advice column. It's supposed to be facts and objectivity, not Dear Dr Miriam Stoppard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.234.165.109 (talk) 21:00, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
BPAS Citation
editVasectomy Reversal: Success Rates
The BPAS numbers are on the BPAS website and while it is not the right sort of reference it's still better than citing the independent. I've taken the liberty of changing it accordingly.
Classification
edit | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I understand procedures can contain link to medical resources. There is no MeSH code for vasectomy reversal. It is too granular. However per WD, there is a nice link to SNOMED CT code for that procedure. How can Medical resources component be modified to fetch this code from WD and present it on the page? EncycloABC (talk) 15:38, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- You'd need to modify Template:Infobox medical intervention; Template talk:Infobox medical intervention is the appropriate place to propose such a change. You may want to ping some of the recent editors of that template, too. Huon (talk) 21:37, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
new infobox
editFor some reason, the specialty is not picked up from Wikidata. (template expects P1995) (and it is present of WD)EncycloABC (talk) 16:45, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
- Well. it is correct now. Maybe it just takes longer.EncycloABC (talk) 17:38, 17 December 2019 (UTC)