This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
There are unused fields for composer, when & where written, when & where composed, translation, language, etc.
—Ojorojo (talk) 20:12, 25 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
I tend to write articles about traditional songs, and usually we don't know who composed them. That's the case with this song. It would be more useful to fields for earliest known date of publication which might be a range of dates, earliest date collected, areas collected from, and so on - though those dates are in the articles. I don't understand the field "text: unknown" - as is usual for traditional songs there are a number of texts which may vary to a greater or lesser extent.Joe Fogey (talk) 22:29, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
P.S. Thanks for your help, Ojorojo. I didn't mean to sound ungrateful. It is a more useful template. I think it might be worth having a template for traditional folk songs to include things like where they have been collected from. It would certainly bear thinking about. Thanks again! Joe Fogey (talk) 22:43, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
As an example, I added an arbitrary "end date" option to Published= in the above, which gives it a range. {{Musical composition}} has over 50 parameters (see Full syntax infobox section). A subset tailored to traditional songs may be warranted if this subset isn't adequate (or is overinclusive). Infoboxes should only contain key factsas discussed in the articles, not miscellaneous details or "information for information's sake". If most traditional song articles don't discuss "key" (generally, they are not locked into one key) or who wrote the melody (distinct from who composed the song), these fields shouldn't be included in a general traditional song infobox. Additionally, they should aim for consistent usage or uniformity from article to article (infoboxes are not open ended – they are limited to a set of parameters with guidelines). —Ojorojo (talk) 17:06, 27 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
