This article has zero credibility and is written with an obvious bias. There is no credible source whatsoever, and a significant amount of effort was put into finding alumni and faculty with achievements that appear noteworthy, but is actually standard experience within the industry. The article is padded with positive rankings and reviews without any consideration for neutrality. As well, as a lesser side note, VanArts is not a notable school, and I can attest to this as a resident of Vancouver. I suspect that this article was written by a marketing agency in an effort to boost the credibility of VanArts when it is clearly not evident in this article, and to boost it's visibility when it lacks any in Vancouver. Cyanhat (talk) 04:42, 16 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
